Explore the Future
of ESG Ratings

Sustainable Future

Powered By

NounsDAONounsDAO
IncoInco
ScrollScroll
ZircuitZircuit
LedgerLedger
The GraphThe Graph
ChainlinkChainlink

Numbers Don't Lie.

Numbers Don't Lie.

Numbers Don't Lie.

Neither Do We.

Neither Do We.

Neither Do We.

Pure Data. Real Impact.

Pure Data. Real Impact.

Pure Data. Real Impact.

IInnttrroodduucciinngg DDeeEESSGG

BBoollsstteerrttrraannssppaarreennccyyaannddeemmppoowweerrssuussttaaiinnaabblleebbuussiinneesssspprraaccttiicceesswwiitthhddeecceennttrraalliizzeeddEESSGGrraattiinngg..

Problems with Traditional ESG

01

Biased Evaluations

Traditional ESG evaluations often suffer from subjective biases and inconsistent methodologies, leading to unreliable assessments.

02

Data Reliability

Current ESG reporting lacks standardization and verification, making it difficult to trust the accuracy of environmental impact data.

03

Lack of Incentives

Companies have limited motivation to maintain high ESG standards due to insufficient rewards for sustainable practices.

FAQ