Explore the Future
of ESG Ratings
Powered By
NounsDAO
Inco
Scroll
Zircuit
Ledger
The Graph
Chainlink
Numbers Don't Lie.
Numbers Don't Lie.
Numbers Don't Lie.
Neither Do We.
Neither Do We.
Neither Do We.
Pure Data. Real Impact.
Pure Data. Real Impact.
Pure Data. Real Impact.
IInnttrroodduucciinngg DDeeEESSGG
BBoollsstteerrttrraannssppaarreennccyyaannddeemmppoowweerrssuussttaaiinnaabblleebbuussiinneesssspprraaccttiicceesswwiitthhddeecceennttrraalliizzeeddEESSGGrraattiinngg..
Problems with Traditional ESG
01
Biased Evaluations
Traditional ESG evaluations often suffer from subjective biases and inconsistent methodologies, leading to unreliable assessments.
02
Data Reliability
Current ESG reporting lacks standardization and verification, making it difficult to trust the accuracy of environmental impact data.
03
Lack of Incentives
Companies have limited motivation to maintain high ESG standards due to insufficient rewards for sustainable practices.